Chances: may, might and could
You may be right; We may go climbing.
We often use may, might and could to talk about the chance (possibility) that something will happen, or is happening.
- We may go climbing in the Alps next summer.
- ‘I think Labour are going to win.’ ‘You may be right.’
- Daniel might phone. If he does, ask him to ring later.
- ‘Where’s Emma?’ ‘I don’t know. She might be out running, I suppose.’
- They’ve agreed, but they could change their minds.
May well, might well and could well suggest stronger possibilities.
- ‘I think it’s going to rain.’ ‘You may well be right – the sky’s really black.’
Can is not normally used to talk about the chance that something will happen or is happening.
- not
It can rain this afternoon. - not
Emma can be out running.
may, might and could: the difference
Might and could are not often used as past forms of may and can: more often they are used to talk about the present or future. Might and could are less definite or more hesitant than may, suggesting a smaller chance – they are used when people think something is possible but not very likely. Compare:
- I may go to London tomorrow. (perhaps a 50% chance)
- Joe might come with me. (perhaps a 30% chance)
Questions: may not used
May is not normally used to ask about the chance of something happening.
- Are you likely to go camping this summer? (not
May you go camping …?) - Has Emma gone running, I wonder? (not
May Emma have gone running?)
But may is possible in indirect questions (for example after Do you think).
- Do you think you may go camping this summer?
Might can be used in direct questions, but this is rather formal.
- Might you go camping? (less natural than Do you think you may/might …?)
Two negatives: may/might not and can’t
There are two ways to make may/might negative: with may/might not (= It is possible that … not …) and with can’t (= It is not possible that …). Compare:
- She may be at home. (= Perhaps she is at home.)
She may not be at home. (= Perhaps she is not at home.)
She can’t be at home. (= She is certainly not at home.) - You might win. (= Perhaps you will win.)
You might not win. (= Perhaps you won’t win.)
You can’t win. (= You certainly won’t win.)
Couldn’t is possible with the same meaning as can’t, but is less common.
might meaning ‘would perhaps’
Might and could (but not may) can have a conditional meaning (= would perhaps).
- Don’t play with knives. You might/could get hurt. (= Perhaps you would get hurt.)
- If you went to bed for an hour, you might feel better. (= … perhaps you would feel better.)
Indirect speech: might/could
Might/could is used in past indirect speech when may was used in direct speech.
- ‘I may go to Scotland.’ ‘What?’ ‘I said I might go to Scotland.’
Past: might/could + infinitive not used
Might/could + infinitive is not normally used to talk about past possibility (except in indirect speech).
- I felt very hot and tired. Perhaps I was ill. (not
… I might be ill.) - but I thought I might be ill.
may/might/could have …: She may have missed her train.
However, to say that it is possible that something happened or was true in the past, we can use may/might/could have + past participle.
- ‘Polly’s very late.’ ‘She may have missed her train.’ (= It is possible that she missed …)
- ‘What was that noise?’ ‘It might/could have been a cat.’
May/might have … can sometimes refer to the present or future.
- I’ll try phoning him, but he may have gone out by now.
- By the end of this year I might have saved some money.
might/could have …: You might/could have killed yourself.
To say that something was possible but did not happen, we can use might/could have …
- You were stupid to try climbing up there. You might/could have killed yourself.
- If she hadn’t been so bad-tempered, I might/could have married her.
May have … is now sometimes used with this meaning too; some people feel that this is not correct.
- You were stupid to try climbing up there. You may have killed yourself. (More normal: … You might/could have killed yourself.)
For might/could have … used to criticise people for not doing things, (see here).
The difference between may/might/could and should/ought to
We use should and ought to to express a deduction that something is probable: they suggest that we have a good reason for this belief.
May, might and could simply say that something is possible, without suggesting that we have a good reason for thinking it is true or will happen. Compare:
- Anna should be in the office now – it’s ten o’clock.
Dan may be in the office now – I don’t know what time he starts work. - I’ve got all John’s keys here. One of them ought to open the safe.
Let’s ask Amy. She might know which is the right one. It’s worth a try.